Evaluate an AI agent before relying on its findings

The conflict agent prompt is changing and the team needs evidence about intended-use performance.

An intended-use evaluation report with actual observations and limitations, not a universal validation claim.

Assurance of AI used in quality/development workflows

Bound intended use and consequence of error; evaluate representative positive, negative and ambiguous cases.

Explain why a clean example alone cannot establish the agent’s reliability.

Engineering and product leaders; basic development knowledge, Ketryx knowledge taught as needed

10–14 min